| |
In
addition to establishing a good project implementation
plan, oversight, or independent periodic review, should
be considered an element of the project controls process.
On-site project personnel can become overwhelmed in
the details of construction and, thus, delay control
activities. Often this results in inaccurate reporting
and a loss of capability for timely response. The independent
reviews help keep events on track.
Oversight is not an audit. Audits are post-mortem examinations
and deal with performance in the past. They carry an
undertone of criticism and punitive connotation. By
contrast, oversight teams use past performance to learn
from, and to encourage future excellence while discouraging
poor performance. What is going right and why, is just
as important as what is going wrong and why. Through
observations of past performance and projections for
future performance, Project Oversight may result in
recommendations and a comprehensive action plan to implement
improvement opportunities. The goal is to assist in
meeting (or exceeding) all project and organizational
goals.
In addition to these processes, operating companies
often conduct formal reviews prior to construction funding
approval. This "design review" focuses on the elements
of risk identified previously (contract type, delivery
method, completeness of scope, definition, budget, cost
contingency, schedule, schedule contingency, and planned
resources). This effort is intended to support that
of the project teams and confirm that the project goals
are consistent with organizational goals.
|
 |